Skip to content

Universities will be mandated by Trump to disclose applicant race information

Universities to Provide Race Data on Applicants at Trump's Request - Headlines from Nation and World News, West Hawaii Today

Universities to be compelled by Trump administration to disclose applicant racial data
Universities to be compelled by Trump administration to disclose applicant racial data

Universities will be mandated by Trump to disclose applicant race information

President Trump has issued a directive that aims to increase transparency and accountability in college admissions. The order requires institutions that receive federal funds to report detailed data on race, gender, test scores, and grade point averages. The purpose is to verify that admissions decisions are being made fairly and without unlawful racial discrimination, aligning with his administration’s push for "merit-based" admissions.

Edward Blum, the head of Students for Fair Admissions, applauded the changes and suggested the Education Department could seek additional information to verify compliance with affirmative action rulings. Blum also suggested the department could force universities to reveal whether other data, such as neighborhood or family income, is being used as a stand-in for race.

Richard Kahlenberg, an advocate for class-based affirmative action, cautioned that the White House's directive would be incomplete without also asking for information about students' socioeconomic status. This, he argues, would provide a more holistic view of the admissions process.

The potential implications of the directive include enhanced transparency, reduced use of race in admissions, increased federal oversight, a possible shift in admissions criteria, and policy challenges and debates. Making admissions data publicly accessible allows students, parents, and taxpayers to better understand how colleges evaluate applicants and helps ensure fairness in admissions practices.

Following the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that race-based admissions violate civil rights, this order seeks to detect and prevent covert racial preferences, aiming for admissions processes based solely on merits such as grades and test scores. The order instructs the Secretary of Education to improve data collection accuracy and enforce timely and complete reporting from institutions, introducing stronger accountability mechanisms.

With a focus on merit, colleges may place greater emphasis on standardized test scores and grade point averages, potentially reducing or eliminating consideration of diversity statements or similar proxies for race or gender. However, critics might contend that such policies could reduce diversity and ignore the benefits of holistic admissions practices.

The data to be collected includes standardized test scores, grade point averages, and other applicant characteristics. The presidential action requires Education Secretary Linda McMahon to increase the number of accuracy checks on the data provided by the schools and to take action against universities deemed to have submitted untimely or inaccurate information.

Some legal experts believe the new requirements may have a chilling effect on universities, while others argue that the Trump administration's actions are based on a "profound misapprehension" of the Supreme Court opinion. The move is aimed at scrutinizing whether universities are giving minorities preference in admissions, a practice that is expressly forbidden.

The Education Department will require colleges to report data on race, sex, and academic achievements for undergraduate and graduate applicants. The data collection is a focus of the Trump administration's effort to shift the ideological balance of academia. The move could invite legal challenges, possibly on the basis of the federal student privacy law.

Without socioeconomic data, universities might appear to admit minority students with lower test scores, contradicting the Supreme Court decision, when they are using family income as a factor in decisions. This directive reflects a broader policy agenda to end diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) preferences in higher education admissions and to hold institutions accountable for adherence to non-discriminatory and merit-based standards.

Sources: 1. NPR 2. The New York Times 3. The Washington Post 4. The Atlantic 5. The Hill

  1. The changes in college admissions, as proposed by President Trump, could lead to a reduction in the use of race in admissions, aligning with his administration's push for merit-based admissions, in contradiction to the policy and legislation surrounding the use of affirmative action in education-and-self-development.
  2. The Education Department's collection of data on race, sex, and academic achievements for undergraduate and graduate applicants, as part of the Trump administration's push for increased transparency and accountability in college admissions, may invite legal challenges, particularly on the basis of the federal student privacy law.
  3. The directive issued by President Trump requiring institutions to report detailed data on race, gender, test scores, and grade point averages, to enforce fairness in admissions practices, could potentially shift the focus in admissions criteria towards merit, such as grades and test scores, while ignoring the benefits of holistic admissions practices, as suggested by advocates like Richard Kahlenberg.

Read also:

    Latest